What if automation represents a spiritual shift in our culture? A current pulling us toward a different kind of life—one where we remember ourselves as human beings with rhythm, imagination, and breath. Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing how work gets done—that much is clear. But underneath the automation of tasks and the restructuring of jobs, something more elemental is unfolding. In this article, I invite you to imagine a world in which AI supports our highest collective Being, a world where automation doesn’t strip us of purpose, but returns us to it. Where technological capacity frees us from the invisible scripts that bind our worth to exhaustion. This is an offering of what becomes possible when we dare to dream beyond survival.
From Displacement to Possibility
Early research on AI and the job market sparked fear that automation would render large segments of the population economically obsolete. Frey and Osborne’s 2013 study warned that nearly half of U.S. jobs were at high risk of automation. What made their study so widely cited—and alarming—was that it reframed automation not as a slow erosion of blue-collar labor, but as a sweeping wave that could displace white-collar workers as well. Lawyers, accountants, administrative assistants, telemarketers, and even transportation workers were identified as vulnerable. And while the authors acknowledged that new jobs could emerge, their model didn’t account for how humans might adapt, retrain, or reorganize their values in response.
But the story is changing. More recent data from McKinsey and the World Economic Forum suggest that while tasks are shifting, people aren’t being replaced wholesale. Instead, work is morphing—roles are evolving, skill sets are shifting, and new forms of collaboration are emerging (McKinsey, 2023; WEF, 2023).
As automation reshapes how work is organized, we have the opportunity to reprogram cultural and economic values, building systems that prioritize equity, sustainability, and human well-being. So what would it look like to meaningfully address these values?
The Case for Working Less
For a moment, imagine: a manageable workweek as the norm. What if the real luxury isn’t more money or more power, but time? Time to move slowly, time to create, time to be with one another without a clock looming overhead.
Rutger Bregman (2020), in Humankind: A Hopeful History, makes a compelling case that much of what we accept as inevitable—overwork, scarcity, competition—is rooted in outdated systems that ignore our innate drive toward cooperation and well-being. He points to societies and historical moments where shorter workweeks and shared resources allowed for more flourishing. When we stop glorifying exhaustion, we begin to remember that rest, generosity, and creativity are aspects of our deepest humanity.
When we’re not burnt out, our nervous systems settle. Our choices soften. We become harder to manipulate or distract because we’re not stuck in survival mode. In that space, it becomes possible to imagine—not just better work, but better living.
The idea of a 20-hour workweek may sound radical in a system still steeped in industrial-age values, but it is far from impossible. The technologies we’ve already built—automation, artificial intelligence, workflow management, and cloud-based tools—make it increasingly feasible to accomplish in 20 hours what used to take 40 or more. Productivity has outpaced wages in many countries for decades (OECD, 2021), meaning we are already doing more with less, but the rewards haven’t been redistributed.
Transitioning to a shorter workweek would require policy support, shifts in management culture, and rethinking how we define productivity. Trials in Iceland and the UK have already shown that reduced working hours can maintain or even improve output, while increasing worker well-being (Haraldsson & Kellam, 2021; Autonomy, 2022).
For salaried workers, this may look like condensed schedules, role-sharing, or four-day weeks. For hourly and gig workers, it will require a reimagining of wage structures, guaranteed basic incomes, or universal benefits that are not tied to employment. These concepts are already being piloted in various places around the globe.
But the deeper shift is cultural. We must be willing to let go of the belief that worth is earned through exhaustion. A cultural reorientation to work becomes possible when we collectively redefine what enough feels like, and when we trust that wellbeing, not busyness, is what moves a society forward.
Reclaiming Attention in the Age of Automation
Automation offers the potential to liberate us from the grind. But only if we reclaim the energy we have poured into systems that were never built to nourish us.
Many people today are overwhelmed by the sheer weight of survival. Wages stagnate while expectations rise. The pressure to keep up—mentally, physically, economically—creates a collective exhaustion that makes even the most thoughtful vision of a better world feel naïve. For most of us, the systemic conditions to embrace rest, joy, or slowness do not yet exist. And that’s precisely why imagining them matters.
Building new culture starts with paying attention to it, with imagining what it could be. And that starts with recovering attention. Social media platforms and digital devices are engineered to hijack the dopamine system, creating addictive loops of scrolling, swiping, and surveillance (Alter, 2017; Newport, 2019). Over time, this constant stimulation fragments not only our focus but our sense of self. It becomes difficult to sit still, to imagine, to dream. The very cognitive space needed to envision a different future is eroded by the technologies that mediate our present.
To truly move toward a 20-hour workweek—or any vision of authentic well-being—we must contend with something deeper: our collective addiction to survival mode and distraction. Many of us have been conditioned to equate urgency with importance, depletion with virtue, and productivity with value.
This is not just a logistical shift, it is a spiritual threshold. Living more slowly requires confronting the discomfort of stillness. Reclaiming time means sitting with the parts of ourselves we’ve long neglected. Healing from survival mode means learning how to inhabit pleasure, rest, and ambiguity in new ways—and not reach for distraction or overwork to numb it. Attention is our most sacred resource. Where we place our energy becomes our life. The invitation of automation, then, is not just to do less—it is to live differently. To put down the performance of worth and remember the pulse of Being.
Automation frees up our time. But what we do with that time is the real question. When our days aren’t dictated by urgency, what becomes possible in the mind? In the body? In our relationships?
We often think the future of work is about scaling, optimizing, competing. But what if the future of work is about healing? About recovering our capacity for attention, our capacity for presence, our capacity for magic?
The CMS model offers a practice, an invitation to slow down and sense what wants to emerge. In this way, it isn’t just responding to automation—it’s responding to a deeper longing—for coherence, for spaciousness, for authentic aliveness. For the kind of intelligence that can’t be outsourced or coded.
Because the real frontier isn’t artificial intelligence. It’s the space that opens up when we stop outsourcing our worth to the machine—and start listening to what’s still alive in us.
Feeling the stir of possibility?
If this vision of the future resonates with you—of working less, living more fully, and reclaiming attention from the machines—let’s stay in conversation.
👉 Explore Services to learn about creativity workshops for teams ready to reimagine work.
👉 Follow me on Linkedin or Instagram for more reflections, resources, and upcoming events.
👉 Or drop me a note—I’d love to hear your thoughts.
The future isn’t written yet. Let’s imagine it together.
References
Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. Penguin.
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (pp. 197–226). University of Chicago Press.
Autonomy. (2022). The four-day week pilot programme: Findings report. https://www.autonomy.work/
Bregman, R. (2020). Humankind: A Hopeful History. Little, Brown and Company.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W.W. Norton.
Clapp, E. P., & Hanson, L. (2019). Participatory Creativity: Introducing Access and Equity to the Creative Classroom. Routledge.
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford Martin School Working Paper.
Haraldsson, G., & Kellam, J. (2021). Going public: Iceland’s journey to a shorter working week. Alda.
Hsieh, L. T., & Ranganath, C. (2014). Frontal midline theta oscillations during working memory maintenance and episodic encoding and retrieval. NeuroImage, 85, 721–729.
Kaplan, R., Schuck, N. W., & Doeller, C. F. (2017). The role of mental maps in decision-making. Trends in Neurosciences, 40(5), 256–259.
Mäkelä, E., & Stephany, F. (2024). Complement or substitute? Labor market effects of generative AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19754.
McKinsey & Company. (2023). The future of work after COVID-19. https://www.mckinsey.com/
McKinsey Global Institute. (2023). Generative AI and the future of work in America. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi
Newport, C. (2019). Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. Portfolio.
OECD. (2021). Labour productivity levels in the total economy. https://data.oecd.org/
Root-Bernstein, R. & Root-Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. M. (1999). Sparks of Genius: The 13 Thinking Tools of the World’s Most Creative People. Houghton Mifflin.
Sawyer, R. K. (2015). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023. https://www.weforum.org
